Fair enough we can fill pages with cut and paste to reinforce our views, I usually don’t bother but
No, it’s called data. It’s verifiable. Satellite images from the last 40 years. Hard to fake.
The other from temperature records. You know, the stuff that is shown on the news every night but from around the world. Also, from publicly available sources.
Or do you think the BOM, CSIRO, NOAA and NASA are just liars?
Maybe he doesn’t want to punish a whole group of people for the actions of a few.
The risk of terrorism is very, very small. Women are thousands of times more likely to be killed by their partners or ex-partners than by a terrorist. Should we get rid of all men?
Thanks @dog, my point exactly.
As someone who has witnessed Terrorism first hand overseas I would have thought you would not want to see any such acts happen here even if the risk was small, and if selective immigration reduces that risk are you not for it ?.
If selective migration reduced risks, then it would perhaps be a good thing. How do you select?
If you select entire nationalities or religious groups to enter Australia because of the actions of one or a few of their citizens/members, the country would be populated entirely by its aboriginal population, and all of us late comers would be deported.
As far as I can tell, there isn’t a country or religion which hasn’t had one of its citizens involved in some sort of atrocity.